Cross-Framework Mapping

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)vsISO 27001:2022

See exactly how FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls map to ISO 27001:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
41%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) maps to ISO 27001:2022 with 41% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Maturity Levels.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight(1 mappings)

CAT-D1-4Training and culture
ISO27001-A.6.3Security awareness and competence programmes

Domain 2: Threat Intelligence and Collaboration(2 mappings)

CAT-D2-1Threat intelligence
ISO27001-A.5.7Cyber threat intelligence gathering
CAT-D2-2Monitoring and analyzing
ISO27001-A.5.7Cyber threat intelligence gathering

Domain 3: Cybersecurity Controls(5 mappings)

CAT-D3-1Preventative controls2 targets
ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance
ISO27001-A.5.3Separation of conflicting duties
CAT-D3-2Detective controls2 targets
ISO27001-A.7.4Physical surveillance and monitoring
ISO27001-A.8.15Audit trail and event logging
CAT-D3-3Corrective controls
ISO27001-A.8.9Secure baseline configuration management

Domain 4: External Dependency Management(2 mappings)

CAT-D4-3Third-party access controls2 targets
ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance
ISO27001-A.5.3Separation of conflicting duties

Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience(4 mappings)

CAT-D5-1Incident planning and strategy3 targets
ISO27001-A.5.24Incident response planning and readiness
ISO27001-A.5.26Incident containment and remediation
ISO27001-A.5.27Post-incident review and improvement
CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing
ISO27001-A.8.14Processing infrastructure high availability

Inherent Risk Profile: Risk Categories(3 mappings)

CAT-IRP-4Organizational characteristics2 targets
ISO27001-A.8.18Restricted use of system-level utilities
ISO27001-A.8.2Elevated privilege governance
CAT-IRP-5External threats
ISO27001-A.5.7Cyber threat intelligence gathering

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and ISO 27001:2022?

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 27 controls across its framework, while ISO 27001:2022 covers 95 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (41% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Maturity Levels, where 5 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct ISO 27001:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and ISO 27001:2022?

Of 27 total FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, 11 map directly to ISO 27001:2022 controls — representing 41% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to ISO 27001:2022?

16 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27001:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Maturity Levels with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and ISO 27001:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is Maturity Levels (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.