TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FBI CJIS Security PolicyvsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how FBI CJIS Security Policy controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FBI CJIS Security Policy maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 24% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Physical and Environmental Security(1 mappings)

CJIS-14Physical Protection
→3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit

Risk and Supply Chain(4 mappings)

CJIS-17Risk Assessment
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
CJIS-19Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.5Securely Dispose of Data

Governance and Agreements(2 mappings)

CJIS-2Security Awareness Training
→3.2.1Account data storage minimised
CJIS-3Personnel Security
→3.9Encrypt Data on Removable Media

System Security(8 mappings)

CJIS-7Configuration Management2 targets
→FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
CJIS-8Media Protection3 targets
→FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
CJIS-9System and Communications Protection3 targets
→FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity

Related Comparisons

Other FBI CJIS Security Policy comparisons

FBI CJIS Security Policy vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)7 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 57 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)6 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs MTCS (Singapore)6 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)6 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs FedRAMP Rev 56 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FBI CJIS Security Policy and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

FBI CJIS Security Policy has 33 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System and Communications Protection, where 3 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between FBI CJIS Security Policy and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 33 total FBI CJIS Security Policy controls, 8 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FBI CJIS Security Policy to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

25 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in System and Communications Protection with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FBI CJIS Security Policy and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is System and Communications Protection (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.