FBI CJIS Security PolicyvsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security
See exactly how FBI CJIS Security Policy controls map to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FBI CJIS Security Policy maps to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security with 2% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 347 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls identifies 339 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in AC: Access Control – FBI CJIS Security Policy.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 347 controls analysed | 1,016 frameworks | 316K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 10 of 10 control mappings across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 316K+ mappings across 1,016 frameworks.
Superseded batch representation – FBI CJIS Security Policy(10 mappings)
A FBI CJIS Security Policy to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls your existing FBI CJIS Security Policy work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 2% in the header counts how many FBI CJIS Security Policy controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other FBI CJIS Security Policy comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 1,016 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 1,016 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (316K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FBI CJIS Security Policy and NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?
FBI CJIS Security Policy has 347 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AC: Access Control – FBI CJIS Security Policy, where 40 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls have no direct NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security equivalent.
How many controls map between FBI CJIS Security Policy and NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?
Of 347 total FBI CJIS Security Policy controls, 8 map directly to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls, representing 2% coverage. The remaining 339 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FBI CJIS Security Policy to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?
339 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in AC: Access Control – FBI CJIS Security Policy with 40 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FBI CJIS Security Policy and NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?
The domain with the highest gap count is AC: Access Control – FBI CJIS Security Policy (40 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.