Cross-Framework Mapping

FBI CJIS Security PolicyvsISO 27001:2022

See exactly how FBI CJIS Security Policy controls map to ISO 27001:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FBI CJIS Security Policy maps to ISO 27001:2022 with 21% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

System Security(5 mappings)

CJIS-10System and Information Integrity
ISO27001-A.8.7Malicious software defence
CJIS-7Configuration Management2 targets
ISO27001-A.8.9Configuration Management
ISO27001-A.8.9Configuration Management
CJIS-8Media Protection
ISO27001-A.8.24Cryptographic protection and key management
CJIS-9System and Communications Protection
ISO27001-A.8.24Cryptographic protection and key management

Physical and Environmental Security(3 mappings)

CJIS-14Physical Protection3 targets
ISO27001-A.7.1Defined secure zones and boundaries
ISO27001-A.7.4Physical Security Monitoring
ISO27001-A.7.4Physical Security Monitoring

Risk and Supply Chain(3 mappings)

CJIS-19Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
ISO27001-A.5.19Third-party security risk management
ISO27001-A.5.20Security clauses in supplier contracts
ISO27001-A.5.22Supplier performance and change monitoring

Governance and Agreements(2 mappings)

CJIS-2Security Awareness Training2 targets
ISO27001-A.6.3Information Security Awareness, Education, and Training
ISO27001-A.6.3Information Security Awareness, Education, and Training

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FBI CJIS Security Policy and ISO 27001:2022?

FBI CJIS Security Policy has 33 controls across its framework, while ISO 27001:2022 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System and Communications Protection, where 3 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls have no direct ISO 27001:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between FBI CJIS Security Policy and ISO 27001:2022?

Of 33 total FBI CJIS Security Policy controls, 7 map directly to ISO 27001:2022 controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FBI CJIS Security Policy to ISO 27001:2022?

26 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27001:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in System and Communications Protection with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FBI CJIS Security Policy and ISO 27001:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is System and Communications Protection (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.