TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FBI CJIS Security PolicyvsFedRAMP Moderate

See exactly how FBI CJIS Security Policy controls map to FedRAMP Moderate. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
3%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FBI CJIS Security Policy maps to FedRAMP Moderate with 3% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Risk and Supply Chain(2 mappings)

CJIS-17Risk Assessment2 targets
→IR-2Incident Response and Recovery
→RA-1Policy and Procedures

Related Comparisons

Other FBI CJIS Security Policy comparisons

FBI CJIS Security Policy vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements8 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)7 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 57 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)6 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs MTCS (Singapore)6 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)6 mappings

Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs FedRAMP Moderate6 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs FedRAMP Moderate6 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs FedRAMP Moderate5 mappingsISO 27017 vs FedRAMP Moderate5 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs FedRAMP Moderate5 mappingsISO 27018 vs FedRAMP Moderate5 mappingsAPI 1164 vs FedRAMP Moderate4 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs FedRAMP Moderate4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FBI CJIS Security Policy and FedRAMP Moderate?

FBI CJIS Security Policy has 33 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Moderate covers 238 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Security, where 4 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls have no direct FedRAMP Moderate equivalent.

How many controls map between FBI CJIS Security Policy and FedRAMP Moderate?

Of 33 total FBI CJIS Security Policy controls, 1 map directly to FedRAMP Moderate controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FBI CJIS Security Policy to FedRAMP Moderate?

32 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Moderate. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FBI CJIS Security Policy and FedRAMP Moderate?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.