Cross-Framework Mapping

FBI CJIS Security PolicyvsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how FBI CJIS Security Policy controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
25
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FBI CJIS Security Policy maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 15% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Risk and Supply Chain(5 mappings)

CJIS-17Risk Assessment
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment
CJIS-19Supply Chain Risk Management4 targets
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment

System Security(3 mappings)

CJIS-7Configuration Management
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
CJIS-8Media Protection
9.1Risk communication and consultation
CJIS-9System and Communications Protection
9.1Risk communication and consultation

Related Comparisons

Other FBI CJIS Security Policy comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FBI CJIS Security Policy and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

FBI CJIS Security Policy has 33 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 62 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System and Communications Protection, where 3 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between FBI CJIS Security Policy and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 33 total FBI CJIS Security Policy controls, 5 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FBI CJIS Security Policy to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

28 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in System and Communications Protection with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FBI CJIS Security Policy and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is System and Communications Protection (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.