FAA Cybersecurity Framework for AviationvsPhilippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)
See exactly how FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls map to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation maps to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) with 16% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls identifies 38 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Cybersecurity Governance(4 mappings)
Risk Management(1 mappings)
Detection, Response and Recovery(1 mappings)
Protection and Defense(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons
Other Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation has 45 controls across its framework, while Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 15 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) equivalent.
How many controls map between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
Of 45 total FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls, 7 map directly to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
38 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.