Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)vsPhilippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)
See exactly how Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) controls map to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) maps to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) with 41% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in VII — Remedies, Liability and Penalties.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
II — Principles(3 mappings)
I — Basic Provisions(2 mappings)
III — Rights of Data Subjects(7 mappings)
IV — Controller and Processor(5 mappings)
V — Transfer to Other Countries and International Organisations(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) comparisons
Other Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) has 29 controls across its framework, while Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (41% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in VII — Remedies, Liability and Penalties, where 3 Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) controls have no direct Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) equivalent.
How many controls map between Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
Of 29 total Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) controls, 12 map directly to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls — representing 41% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
17 Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) controls have no direct equivalent in Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175). The highest concentration of gaps is in VII — Remedies, Liability and Penalties with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
The domain with the highest gap count is VII — Remedies, Liability and Penalties (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.