FAA Cybersecurity Framework for AviationvsNYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)
See exactly how FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls map to NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation maps to NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) with 42% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 46 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Risk Management(15 mappings)
Detection, Response and Recovery(4 mappings)
Cybersecurity Governance(1 mappings)
+26 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons
Other NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)?
FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation has 45 controls across its framework, while NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (42% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 10 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) equivalent.
How many controls map between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)?
Of 45 total FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls, 19 map directly to NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls — representing 42% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation to NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)?
26 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.