TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)vsNYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)

See exactly how CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls map to NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

29
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
80%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) maps to NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) with 80% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 15 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Threat and Vulnerability Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 15 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Threat and Vulnerability Management(6 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment3 targets
→NYDFS-500.14cCybersecurity Awareness Training
→NYDFS-500.5Penetration Testing and Vulnerability Assessments
→NYDFS-500.9bRisk Assessment Content
AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence
→NYDFS-500.4cSenior Governing Body Oversight
CSA-TVM-01Vulnerability Management
→NYDFS-500.5Penetration Testing and Vulnerability Assessments
CSA-TVM-02Penetration Testing
→NYDFS-500.5Penetration Testing and Vulnerability Assessments

Data Security and Privacy(8 mappings)

CSA-DATA-01Data Classification and Handling
→NYDFS-500.13Asset Management and Data Governance
CSA-DATA-02Encryption and Key Management2 targets
→314.4(c)(3)Encryption requirements
→NYDFS-500.15Encryption of Nonpublic Information
CSA-DATA-03Data Retention and Deletion2 targets
→NYDFS-500.16Incident Response and Business Continuity
→NYDFS-500.2bProgram Core Functions
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design3 targets
→NYDFS-500.14cCybersecurity Awareness Training
→NYDFS-500.5Penetration Testing and Vulnerability Assessments
→NYDFS-500.9bRisk Assessment Content

Infrastructure and Operations Security(6 mappings)

CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management6 targets
→314.4(c)(1)Access controls
→314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication
→HIPAA-164.312(a)(1)Access control
→HIPAA-164.312(d)Person or entity authentication
→NYDFS-500-CLA-4Privileged Access Management
→NYDFS-500.12Multi-Factor Authentication

+9 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs CSA CCM v414 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)14 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework13 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs BIMCO Cyber Security12 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs CAIQ (CSA)12 mappings

Other NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)22 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)22 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)21 mappingsProposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)20 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)20 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)?

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) has 15 controls across its framework, while NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (80% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Threat and Vulnerability Management, where 2 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) equivalent.

How many controls map between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)?

Of 15 total CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls, 12 map directly to NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls — representing 80% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) to NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)?

3 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct equivalent in NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500). The highest concentration of gaps is in Threat and Vulnerability Management with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Threat and Vulnerability Management (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.