FAA Cybersecurity Framework for AviationvsC2M2
See exactly how FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls map to C2M2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation maps to C2M2 with 29% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 68 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls identifies 48 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 68 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 47 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.
Risk Management(15 mappings)
Cybersecurity Governance(5 mappings)
+27 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 768 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons
Other C2M2 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 768 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and C2M2?
FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation has 68 controls across its framework, while C2M2 covers 47 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 11 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct C2M2 equivalent.
How many controls map between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and C2M2?
Of 68 total FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls, 20 map directly to C2M2 controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 48 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation to C2M2?
48 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in C2M2. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and C2M2?
The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.