Cross-Framework Mapping

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for AviationvsGLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems

See exactly how FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls map to GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

40
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation maps to GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems with 38% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 40 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Management(12 mappings)

CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process2 targets
38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment2 targets
38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management2 targets
GLI33-3.4Risk Management Controls
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management2 targets
GLI33-3.4Risk Management Controls
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach2 targets
GLI33-3.4Risk Management Controls
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment2 targets
38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs

Cybersecurity Governance(8 mappings)

FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities2 targets
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
GLI33-1.2Wager Types and Rules
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight2 targets
GLI33-3.4Risk Management Controls
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment2 targets
38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management2 targets
GLI33-3.4Risk Management Controls
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management

+20 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

Other GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems?

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation has 45 controls across its framework, while GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems covers 46 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 10 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems?

Of 45 total FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls, 17 map directly to GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation to GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems?

28 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.