CSA CCM v4vsGLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems
See exactly how CSA CCM v4 controls map to GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CSA CCM v4 maps to GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems with 19% coverage across 32 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 171 CSA CCM v4 controls identifies 139 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 171 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 54 mapped controls across 10 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
AIS - Audit & Assurance(1 mappings)
BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience(8 mappings)
CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management(6 mappings)
DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management(5 mappings)
+34 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other CSA CCM v4 comparisons
Other GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CSA CCM v4 and GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems?
CSA CCM v4 has 171 controls across its framework, while GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems covers 46 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 32 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 18 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems equivalent.
How many controls map between CSA CCM v4 and GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems?
Of 171 total CSA CCM v4 controls, 32 map directly to GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 139 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA CCM v4 to GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems?
139 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct equivalent in GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 18 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA CCM v4 and GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems?
The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (18 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.