EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)vsDORA
See exactly how EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls map to DORA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) maps to DORA with 5% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in MiCA - Asset-Referenced Tokens (Title III).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
MiCA - CASP Authorisation and General Obligations (Title V Ch 1-3)(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other DORA comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) and DORA?
EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) has 22 controls across its framework, while DORA covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in MiCA - Asset-Referenced Tokens (Title III), where 6 EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls have no direct DORA equivalent.
How many controls map between EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) and DORA?
Of 22 total EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls, 1 map directly to DORA controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) to DORA?
21 EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls have no direct equivalent in DORA. The highest concentration of gaps is in MiCA - Asset-Referenced Tokens (Title III) with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) and DORA?
The domain with the highest gap count is MiCA - Asset-Referenced Tokens (Title III) (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.