EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600)vsDORA
See exactly how EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) controls map to DORA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) maps to DORA with 60% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in EIOPA ICT - ICT Operations and Change Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
EIOPA ICT - Information Security(6 mappings)
EIOPA ICT - ICT Operations and Change Management(2 mappings)
EIOPA ICT - Business Continuity Management(4 mappings)
EIOPA ICT - Governance and Risk Management(4 mappings)
EIOPA ICT - Outsourcing of ICT Services(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) comparisons
Other DORA comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) and DORA?
EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) has 25 controls across its framework, while DORA covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (60% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in EIOPA ICT - ICT Operations and Change Management, where 3 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) controls have no direct DORA equivalent.
How many controls map between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) and DORA?
Of 25 total EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) controls, 15 map directly to DORA controls — representing 60% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) to DORA?
10 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) controls have no direct equivalent in DORA. The highest concentration of gaps is in EIOPA ICT - ICT Operations and Change Management with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) and DORA?
The domain with the highest gap count is EIOPA ICT - ICT Operations and Change Management (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.