Cross-Framework Mapping

EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised SystemsvsISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles

See exactly how EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems controls map to ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems maps to ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles with 17% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 23 EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in General Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 23 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

General Requirements(3 mappings)

Clause 1Risk management
ISO-26262-3-7Hazard analysis and risk assessment (HARA)
Clause 2Personnel
ISO-26262-3-5Item definition
Clause 3Suppliers and service providers
ISO-26262-3-5Item definition

Operational Phase — Change and Configuration(3 mappings)

Clause 10Change and configuration management3 targets
ISO-26262-3-5Item definition
ISO-26262-8-7Configuration management
ISO-26262-8-8Change management

Related Comparisons

Other EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems comparisons

Other ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems and ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems has 23 controls across its framework, while ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in General Requirements, where 6 EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems controls have no direct ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles equivalent.

How many controls map between EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems and ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

Of 23 total EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems controls, 4 map directly to ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems to ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

19 EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles. The highest concentration of gaps is in General Requirements with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems and ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

The domain with the highest gap count is General Requirements (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.