Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security GuidelinesvsISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles

See exactly how CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines controls map to ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
37
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines maps to ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles with 12% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Access Control and Authentication.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Access Control and Authentication(2 mappings)

FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures
ISO-26262-3-5Item definition
FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management
ISO-26262-3-5Item definition

Patch Management and System Hardening(2 mappings)

ICS-PM-2System hardening
ISO-26262-8-7Configuration management
ICS-PM-3Change management
ISO-26262-8-8Change management

Risk Assessment and Asset Management(1 mappings)

ICS-RA-3Risk assessment methodology
ISO-26262-3-7Hazard analysis and risk assessment (HARA)

Related Comparisons

Other CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines comparisons

Other ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines and ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines has 42 controls across its framework, while ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Access Control and Authentication, where 17 CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines controls have no direct ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines and ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

Of 42 total CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines controls, 5 map directly to ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines to ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

37 CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles. The highest concentration of gaps is in Access Control and Authentication with 17 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines and ISO 26262:2018 — Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

The domain with the highest gap count is Access Control and Authentication (17 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.