Cross-Framework Mapping

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)vsIEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes

See exactly how EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls map to IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
36
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) maps to IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes with 10% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls identifies 45 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Information Security(6 mappings)

EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security3 targets
IEC62304-5.2Software Requirements Analysis
IEC62304-5.3Software Architectural Design
IEC62304-7.2Risk Control Measures
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management3 targets
IEC62304-4.1Quality Management System
IEC62304-5.1Software Development Planning
IEC62304-7.4Risk Management of Software Changes

ICT Operations and Change Management(5 mappings)

EIOPA-GL-15ICT Project and Change Management2 targets
IEC62304-8.2Change Control
IEC62304-9.4Use Change Control Process
EIOPA-GL-19ICT Third-Party Risk Management3 targets
IEC62304-4.1Quality Management System
IEC62304-5.1Software Development Planning
IEC62304-7.4Risk Management of Software Changes

Proportionality and Governance(3 mappings)

EIOPA-GL-4ICT and Security Risks Within the Risk Management System3 targets
IEC62304-4.1Quality Management System
IEC62304-5.1Software Development Planning
IEC62304-7.4Risk Management of Software Changes

Related Comparisons

Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons

Other IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes?

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) has 50 controls across its framework, while IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 31 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls have no direct IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes equivalent.

How many controls map between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes?

Of 50 total EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls, 5 map directly to IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 45 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) to IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes?

45 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls have no direct equivalent in IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 31 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (31 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.