EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)vsIEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes
See exactly how EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls map to IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) maps to IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes with 19% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in 3.4 Information Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
3.2 Governance and Strategy(3 mappings)
3.3 ICT and Security Risk Management Framework(3 mappings)
3.4 Information Security(3 mappings)
3.6 ICT Project and Change Management(5 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) comparisons
Other IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes?
EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) has 26 controls across its framework, while IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 3.4 Information Security, where 6 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls have no direct IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes equivalent.
How many controls map between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes?
Of 26 total EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls, 5 map directly to IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) to IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes?
21 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls have no direct equivalent in IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes. The highest concentration of gaps is in 3.4 Information Security with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes?
The domain with the highest gap count is 3.4 Information Security (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.