Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024vsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)
See exactly how Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 controls map to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 maps to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) with 35% coverage across 32 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 91 Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 controls identifies 59 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 91 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 50 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Information Security(20 mappings)
+30 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 comparisons
Other EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?
Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 has 91 controls across its framework, while EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 32 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 20 Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 controls have no direct EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) equivalent.
How many controls map between Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?
Of 91 total Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 controls, 32 map directly to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 59 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?
59 Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 controls have no direct equivalent in EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 20 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (20 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.