EASA Part-IS — Information Security in AviationvsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange
See exactly how EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls map to TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation maps to TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange with 50% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 18 EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 18 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Part-IS.AR: Authority Requirements(2 mappings)
Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645)(5 mappings)
Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203)(7 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation comparisons
Other TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation and TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange?
EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation has 18 controls across its framework, while TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange covers 47 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645), where 4 EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls have no direct TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange equivalent.
How many controls map between EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation and TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange?
Of 18 total EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls, 9 map directly to TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation to TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange?
9 EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange. The highest concentration of gaps is in Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645) with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation and TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange?
The domain with the highest gap count is Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645) (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.