TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EASA Part-IS — Information Security in AviationvsC2M2

See exactly how EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls map to C2M2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
44%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation maps to C2M2 with 44% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 18 EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 18 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Part-IS.AR: Authority Requirements(3 mappings)

IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response3 targets
→C2M2-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
→C2M2-18Reporting obligations to authorities
→C2M2-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents

Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645)(6 mappings)

IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment2 targets
→C2M2-07Personnel risk assessment
→C2M2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→C2M2-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events3 targets
→C2M2-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
→C2M2-18Reporting obligations to authorities
→C2M2-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents

Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203)(7 mappings)

IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment2 targets
→C2M2-07Personnel risk assessment
→C2M2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→C2M2-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management
→C2M2-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
IS.I.OR.225External Reporting3 targets
→C2M2-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
→C2M2-18Reporting obligations to authorities
→C2M2-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents

Related Comparisons

Other EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation comparisons

EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements9 mappingsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange9 mappingsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation vs South Korea ISMS-P9 mappingsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation vs IEEE 16868 mappingsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation vs NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)8 mappingsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation vs API 11648 mappingsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation vs EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems8 mappingsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation vs Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT)8 mappings

Other C2M2 comparisons

API 1164 vs C2M216 mappingsBIMCO Cyber Security vs C2M216 mappingsDO-326A / ED-202A vs C2M216 mappingsISO 27019 vs C2M216 mappingsIEC 62443 vs C2M216 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs C2M216 mappingsNIS2 Directive vs C2M216 mappingsNIST SP 1800-32 vs C2M216 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation and C2M2?

EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation has 18 controls across its framework, while C2M2 covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (44% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645), where 4 EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls have no direct C2M2 equivalent.

How many controls map between EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation and C2M2?

Of 18 total EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls, 8 map directly to C2M2 controls — representing 44% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation to C2M2?

10 EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in C2M2. The highest concentration of gaps is in Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645) with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation and C2M2?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645) (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.