TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in AviationvsSANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology

See exactly how EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls map to SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
23
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation maps to SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology with 15% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Part-IS.AR: Authority Requirements(3 mappings)

IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response3 targets
→PICERL-C2System Backup
→PICERL-C3Long-Term Containment
→PICERL-L3Plan Improvement

Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645)(4 mappings)

IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→PICERL-P2Risk Assessment
IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events3 targets
→PICERL-C2System Backup
→PICERL-C3Long-Term Containment
→PICERL-L3Plan Improvement

Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203)(4 mappings)

IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→PICERL-P2Risk Assessment
IS.I.OR.225External Reporting3 targets
→PICERL-C2System Backup
→PICERL-C3Long-Term Containment
→PICERL-L3Plan Improvement

Related Comparisons

Other EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation comparisons

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements9 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation)8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIS2 Directive8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NERC CIP8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs MTCS (Singapore)8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs API 11648 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs Annex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems8 mappings

Other SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology comparisons

PSD2 SCA vs SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology7 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology7 mappingsISO 22320:2018 vs SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology7 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology7 mappingsPCI SSF vs SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology7 mappingsISO 27019 vs SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology7 mappingsISO 27017 vs SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology7 mappingsPCI PIN Security vs SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology7 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology?

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation has 34 controls across its framework, while SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203), where 5 EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls have no direct SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology equivalent.

How many controls map between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology?

Of 34 total EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls, 5 map directly to SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation to SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology?

31 EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology. The highest concentration of gaps is in Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.