TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in AviationvsOECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)

See exactly how EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls map to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation maps to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) with 9% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645)(1 mappings)

IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→OECDAI24-3Frontier Model Risk Management, Capability Disclosure, and Independent Evaluation

Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203)(2 mappings)

IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→OECDAI24-3Frontier Model Risk Management, Capability Disclosure, and Independent Evaluation
IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management
→OECDAI24-3Frontier Model Risk Management, Capability Disclosure, and Independent Evaluation

Related Comparisons

Other EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation comparisons

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements9 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation)8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIS2 Directive8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NERC CIP8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs MTCS (Singapore)8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs API 11648 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs Annex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems8 mappings

Other OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) comparisons

ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics vs OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)6 mappingsCanada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) vs OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)5 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)4 mappingsAdministrative Measures for the Security Assessment of Generative AI Services (2023) and Algorithmic Recommendation Management Provisions (2022) vs OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)4 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)3 mappingsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)2 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)2 mappingsUN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) vs OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)2 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation has 34 controls across its framework, while OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645), where 6 EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls have no direct OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) equivalent.

How many controls map between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?

Of 34 total EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls, 3 map directly to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?

33 EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update). The highest concentration of gaps is in Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645) with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645) (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.