TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in AviationvsNFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management

See exactly how EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls map to NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
27
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation maps to NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management with 18% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Part-IS.AR: Authority Requirements(3 mappings)

IS.AR.210Findings and Corrective Actions2 targets
→NFPA1600-7.2After-Action Reporting
→NFPA1600-8.2Corrective Action
IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
→NFPA1600-6.3Emergency Response Operations

Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645)(2 mappings)

IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→NFPA1600-5.1Risk Assessment
IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
→NFPA1600-6.3Emergency Response Operations

Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203)(2 mappings)

IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→NFPA1600-5.1Risk Assessment
IS.I.OR.225External Reporting
→NFPA1600-6.3Emergency Response Operations

Related Comparisons

Other EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation comparisons

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs ISO 27701:201911 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements9 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation)8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIS2 Directive8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NERC CIP8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs MTCS (Singapore)8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs API 11648 mappings

Other NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management6 mappingsISO 41001:2018 - Facility Management Systems vs NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management6 mappingsISO 39001:2012 - Road Traffic Safety Management vs NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management6 mappingsISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems vs NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management6 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard vs NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management6 mappingsISO 22301:2019 vs NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management5 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories vs NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management?

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation has 34 controls across its framework, while NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203), where 5 EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls have no direct NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management equivalent.

How many controls map between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management?

Of 34 total EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls, 6 map directly to NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation to NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management?

30 EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.