TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

DORAvsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)

See exactly how DORA controls map to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
31%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

DORA maps to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) with 31% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 DORA controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management(7 mappings)

DORA-Art.10Detection
→EBA-GL-3.4.5Security monitoring
DORA-Art.11Response and recovery2 targets
→EBA-GL-3.7.1Business impact analysis
→EBA-GL-3.7.3Response and recovery plans
DORA-Art.5Governance and organisation
→EBA-GL-3.2.1Governance
DORA-Art.6ICT risk management framework
→EBA-GL-3.3.1Organisation and objectives
DORA-Art.8Identification
→EBA-GL-3.3.2Identification of functions, processes and assets
DORA-Art.9Protection and prevention
→EBA-GL-3.4.2Logical security

DORA Chapter III: ICT-Related Incident Management(1 mappings)

DORA-Art.17ICT-related incident management process
→EBA-GL-3.5.1ICT incident and problem management

DORA Chapter V: ICT Third-Party Risk Management(1 mappings)

DORA-Art.28ICT third-party risk: general principles
→EBA-GL-3.2.3Use of third party providers

Related Comparisons

Other DORA comparisons

DORA vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600)12 mappingsDORA vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.011 mappingsDORA vs EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2)8 mappingsDORA vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 56 mappingsDORA vs EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)2 mappingsDORA vs EU Cyber Solidarity Act (Regulation (EU) 2025/38)2 mappingsDORA vs EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781)2 mappingsDORA vs ECB TIBER-EU Framework2 mappings

Other EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)4 mappingsISO 27002:2022 vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)2 mappingsISO 27018:2019 vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)2 mappingsISO 22301:2019 vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)1 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)1 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)1 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)1 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)1 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between DORA and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

DORA has 26 controls across its framework, while EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management, where 5 DORA controls have no direct EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) equivalent.

How many controls map between DORA and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

Of 26 total DORA controls, 8 map directly to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping DORA to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

18 DORA controls have no direct equivalent in EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). The highest concentration of gaps is in DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between DORA and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

The domain with the highest gap count is DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.