DORAvsEU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)
See exactly how DORA controls map to EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
DORA maps to EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) with 8% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 DORA controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
DORA Chapter V: ICT Third-Party Risk Management(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other DORA comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between DORA and EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)?
DORA has 26 controls across its framework, while EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management, where 11 DORA controls have no direct EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) equivalent.
How many controls map between DORA and EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)?
Of 26 total DORA controls, 2 map directly to EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping DORA to EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)?
24 DORA controls have no direct equivalent in EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). The highest concentration of gaps is in DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between DORA and EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)?
The domain with the highest gap count is DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.