DORAvsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600)
See exactly how DORA controls map to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
DORA maps to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) with 46% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 DORA controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management(13 mappings)
DORA Chapter III: ICT-Related Incident Management(1 mappings)
DORA Chapter IV: Digital Operational Resilience Testing(2 mappings)
DORA Chapter V: ICT Third-Party Risk Management(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other DORA comparisons
Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between DORA and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600)?
DORA has 26 controls across its framework, while EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (46% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management, where 4 DORA controls have no direct EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) equivalent.
How many controls map between DORA and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600)?
Of 26 total DORA controls, 12 map directly to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) controls — representing 46% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping DORA to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600)?
14 DORA controls have no direct equivalent in EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600). The highest concentration of gaps is in DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between DORA and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600)?
The domain with the highest gap count is DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.