ISO 22301:2019vsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)
See exactly how ISO 22301:2019 controls map to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 22301:2019 maps to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) with 5% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO 22301:2019 controls identifies 42 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation – ISO 22301:2019.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Operation – ISO 22301:2019(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 22301:2019 comparisons
Other EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 22301:2019 and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?
ISO 22301:2019 has 44 controls across its framework, while EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation – ISO 22301:2019, where 17 ISO 22301:2019 controls have no direct EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 22301:2019 and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?
Of 44 total ISO 22301:2019 controls, 2 map directly to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 42 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22301:2019 to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?
42 ISO 22301:2019 controls have no direct equivalent in EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation – ISO 22301:2019 with 17 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22301:2019 and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Operation – ISO 22301:2019 (17 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.