DORAvsC5 (Germany)
See exactly how DORA controls map to C5 (Germany). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which C5 (Germany) controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
DORA maps to C5 (Germany) with 81% coverage across 21 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 DORA controls identifies 5 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 67 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management(20 mappings)
+47 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The DORA to C5 (Germany) crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which C5 (Germany) controls your existing DORA work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
37 of 121 C5 (Germany) controls are evidenced by work you have already done for DORA. 84 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
All information and ICT assets supporting business functions must be identified and documented.
Grounded in DORA-Art.8 Identification. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Document, communicate and issue acceptable use and safe handling instructions spanning approval for acquisition through disposal, classification and labelling, secure configuration, software versions and patching, unsupported software,...
Every one of the 37 evidenced controls and 84 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 81% in the header counts how many DORA controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many C5 (Germany) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other DORA comparisons
Other C5 (Germany) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between DORA and C5 (Germany)?
DORA has 26 controls across its framework, while C5 (Germany) covers 121 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 21 overlapping controls (81% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection, where 1 DORA controls have no direct C5 (Germany) equivalent.
How many controls map between DORA and C5 (Germany)?
Of 26 total DORA controls, 21 map directly to C5 (Germany) controls, representing 81% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping DORA to C5 (Germany)?
5 DORA controls have no direct equivalent in C5 (Germany). The highest concentration of gaps is in DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between DORA and C5 (Germany)?
The domain with the highest gap count is DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.