Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1vsHIPAA Security Rule
See exactly how Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls map to HIPAA Security Rule. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which HIPAA Security Rule controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 maps to HIPAA Security Rule with 54% coverage across 107 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls identifies 90 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 197 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 148 mapped controls across 16 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.
A&A - Audit & Assurance(6 mappings)
AIS - Application & Interface Security(1 mappings)
BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience(13 mappings)
+128 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to HIPAA Security Rule crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which HIPAA Security Rule controls your existing Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into HIPAA Security Rule lands at 67.2%, while HIPAA Security Rule into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 lands at 33.5%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 evidence buys you for HIPAA Security Rule, the other asks the reverse.
45 of 67 HIPAA Security Rule controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. 22 are genuine gaps.
66 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for HIPAA Security Rule. 131 are genuine gaps.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 54% in the header counts how many Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many HIPAA Security Rule controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 comparisons
Other HIPAA Security Rule comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 868 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and HIPAA Security Rule?
Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 has 197 controls across its framework, while HIPAA Security Rule covers 67 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 107 overlapping controls (54% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 16 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct HIPAA Security Rule equivalent.
How many controls map between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and HIPAA Security Rule?
Of 197 total Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls, 107 map directly to HIPAA Security Rule controls, representing 54% coverage. The remaining 90 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to HIPAA Security Rule?
90 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct equivalent in HIPAA Security Rule. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 16 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and HIPAA Security Rule?
The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (16 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.