FedRAMP ModeratevsHIPAA Security Rule
See exactly how FedRAMP Moderate controls map to HIPAA Security Rule. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which HIPAA Security Rule controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FedRAMP Moderate maps to HIPAA Security Rule with 0% coverage across 131 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 238 FedRAMP Moderate controls identifies 192 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CM - Configuration Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 238 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 179 mapped controls across 18 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
AC - Access Control(20 mappings)
+159 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The FedRAMP Moderate to HIPAA Security Rule crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which HIPAA Security Rule controls your existing FedRAMP Moderate work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. FedRAMP Moderate into HIPAA Security Rule lands at 77.6%, while HIPAA Security Rule into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 26.9%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your FedRAMP Moderate evidence buys you for HIPAA Security Rule, the other asks the reverse.
52 of 67 HIPAA Security Rule controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 15 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Risk assessment identifies threats, vulnerabilities and impact to the system and its data.
Grounded in RA-3 Risk Assessment. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Covered entities and business associates must ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of all electronic protected health information (ePHI) they create, receive, maintain, or transmit; protect against reasonably anticipated...
Every one of the 52 evidenced controls and 15 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
87 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for HIPAA Security Rule. 236 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Information access management is the documented access control policy.
Grounded in 164.308(a)(4)(i) Information Access Management (Standard). Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Device Lock | Pattern-hiding Displays. Conceal, via the device lock, information previously visible on the display with a publicly viewable image
Every one of the 87 evidenced controls and 236 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 0% in the header counts how many FedRAMP Moderate controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many HIPAA Security Rule controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons
Other HIPAA Security Rule comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FedRAMP Moderate and HIPAA Security Rule?
FedRAMP Moderate has 238 controls across its framework, while HIPAA Security Rule covers 67 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 131 overlapping controls (0% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CM - Configuration Management, where 25 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct HIPAA Security Rule equivalent.
How many controls map between FedRAMP Moderate and HIPAA Security Rule?
Of 238 total FedRAMP Moderate controls, 131 map directly to HIPAA Security Rule controls, representing 0% coverage. The remaining 192 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Moderate to HIPAA Security Rule?
192 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct equivalent in HIPAA Security Rule. The highest concentration of gaps is in CM - Configuration Management with 25 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Moderate and HIPAA Security Rule?
The domain with the highest gap count is CM - Configuration Management (25 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.