CIS Controls v8vsNIST SP 800-218
See exactly how CIS Controls v8 controls map to NIST SP 800-218. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST SP 800-218 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CIS Controls v8 maps to NIST SP 800-218 with 16% coverage across 25 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls identifies 128 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CIS Control 3: Data Protection.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 153 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 58 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
CIS Control 14: Security Awareness and Skills Training(1 mappings)
CIS Control 15: Service Provider Management(1 mappings)
CIS Control 16: Application Software Security(18 mappings)
+38 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The CIS Controls v8 to NIST SP 800-218 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-218 controls your existing CIS Controls v8 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. CIS Controls v8 into NIST SP 800-218 lands at 50%, while NIST SP 800-218 into CIS Controls v8 lands at 8.5%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your CIS Controls v8 evidence buys you for NIST SP 800-218, the other asks the reverse.
21 of 42 NIST SP 800-218 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CIS Controls v8. 21 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
The documented development process must address secure design and coding standards
Grounded in CIS-16.1 Establish and Maintain a Secure Application Development Process. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Configure development tools, source control, build systems, and artifact repositories to enforce the security requirements. Automate enforcement so that compliance is the default behavior rather than a manual checklist.
Every one of the 21 evidenced controls and 21 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
13 of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-218. 140 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Assigned secure development roles and responsibilities are part of the process this safeguard requires.
Grounded in SP800-218-PO.2.1 Roles and Responsibilities for Secure Development. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Establish and maintain an accurate, detailed, and up-to-date inventory of all enterprise assets with the potential to store or process data, to include: end-user devices (including portable and mobile), network devices, non-computing/IoT...
Every one of the 13 evidenced controls and 140 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 16% in the header counts how many CIS Controls v8 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-218 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other CIS Controls v8 comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-218 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CIS Controls v8 and NIST SP 800-218?
CIS Controls v8 has 153 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-218 covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 25 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CIS Control 3: Data Protection, where 14 CIS Controls v8 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-218 equivalent.
How many controls map between CIS Controls v8 and NIST SP 800-218?
Of 153 total CIS Controls v8 controls, 25 map directly to NIST SP 800-218 controls, representing 16% coverage. The remaining 128 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CIS Controls v8 to NIST SP 800-218?
128 CIS Controls v8 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-218. The highest concentration of gaps is in CIS Control 3: Data Protection with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CIS Controls v8 and NIST SP 800-218?
The domain with the highest gap count is CIS Control 3: Data Protection (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.