Cross-Framework Mapping

CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)vsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation

See exactly how CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) controls map to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
26%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) maps to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation with 26% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement and Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Scope and Definitions(6 mappings)

64.2003Definitions3 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
PNG-CC-CG-02NICTA Oversight
64.2004Customer Approval Mechanisms
PNG-CC-CG-02NICTA Oversight
Art. 2Consent Definition2 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability

Enforcement and Compliance(2 mappings)

AIDA-16Criminal Provisions
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection
Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection

Incident Reporting Requirements(8 mappings)

Dir. 1Mandatory Incident Reporting2 targets
FAA-CS-4.2Incident Response
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response
Dir. 3Incident Report Format6 targets
CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy

Covered Entities and Scope(2 mappings)

Sec. 2240(a)Definitions2 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability

Information Sharing and Use(1 mappings)

Sec. 2243(b)Privacy and civil liberties protections
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection

Interagency Coordination(1 mappings)

Sec. 2246(d)Threat intelligence sharing
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) comparisons

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) has 38 controls across its framework, while FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement and Compliance, where 9 CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) controls have no direct FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

Of 38 total CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) controls, 10 map directly to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

28 CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) controls have no direct equivalent in FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement and Compliance with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement and Compliance (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.