Cross-Framework Mapping

CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)vsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)

See exactly how CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) controls map to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
25
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) maps to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) with 24% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) controls identifies 29 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement and Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Scope and Definitions(4 mappings)

64.2003Definitions2 targets
CSA-INF-04Incident Management
CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
Art. 2Consent Definition2 targets
CSA-INF-04Incident Management
CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

Enforcement and Compliance(2 mappings)

AIDA-16Criminal Provisions
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design
Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design

Incident Reporting Requirements(3 mappings)

Dir. 1Mandatory Incident Reporting
CSA-INF-04Incident Management
Dir. 3Incident Report Format2 targets
AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design

Covered Entities and Scope(2 mappings)

Sec. 2240(a)Definitions2 targets
CSA-INF-04Incident Management
CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

Information Sharing and Use(1 mappings)

Sec. 2243(b)Privacy and civil liberties protections
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design

Interagency Coordination(1 mappings)

Sec. 2246(d)Threat intelligence sharing
AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence

Related Comparisons

Other CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) comparisons

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) has 38 controls across its framework, while CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement and Compliance, where 9 CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) controls have no direct CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) equivalent.

How many controls map between CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

Of 38 total CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) controls, 9 map directly to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 29 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

29 CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) controls have no direct equivalent in CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement and Compliance with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement and Compliance (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.