TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
13
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 24% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 17 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CCSDS 350.0-G-3: Security Implementation Options.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 17 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

CCSDS 350.0-G-3: Space Security Concepts(2 mappings)

CCSDS350-2.1Information Security Overview
→NIST-CSF-GV.OC-01Organizational context for cybersecurity risk management is understood
CCSDS350-2.3Types of Threat
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded

CCSDS 350.0-G-3: Security Mechanisms(2 mappings)

CCSDS350-4.2Authentication
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed
CCSDS350-4.5Availability
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized access

Related Comparisons

Other CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) comparisons

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 514 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs ISO 27001:20223 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs ISO 27018:20192 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs ISO 27002:20222 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs ISO 27701:20191 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs ISO 270181 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs ISO/IEC 42001:20231 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs ISO/IEC 27018:20191 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

Belgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.025 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) has 17 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CCSDS 350.0-G-3: Security Implementation Options, where 5 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 17 total CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls, 4 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

13 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in CCSDS 350.0-G-3: Security Implementation Options with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is CCSDS 350.0-G-3: Security Implementation Options (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.