Cross-Framework Mapping

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)vsISO 27001:2022

See exactly how CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls map to ISO 27001:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) maps to ISO 27001:2022 with 18% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 17 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CCSDS 350.0-G-3: Security Implementation Options.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 17 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

CCSDS 350.0-G-3: Security Mechanisms(3 mappings)

CCSDS350-4.1Confidentiality
iso-27001-2022::6.6Confidentiality or non-disclosure Control
CCSDS350-4.2Authentication
iso-27001-2022::5.17Authentication information Control
CCSDS350-4.4Access Control
iso-27001-2022::5.15Access control Control

Related Comparisons

Other CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) comparisons

Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and ISO 27001:2022?

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) has 17 controls across its framework, while ISO 27001:2022 covers 56 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CCSDS 350.0-G-3: Security Implementation Options, where 5 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls have no direct ISO 27001:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and ISO 27001:2022?

Of 17 total CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls, 3 map directly to ISO 27001:2022 controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) to ISO 27001:2022?

14 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27001:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in CCSDS 350.0-G-3: Security Implementation Options with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 - Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and ISO 27001:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is CCSDS 350.0-G-3: Security Implementation Options (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.