C2M2vsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation
See exactly how C2M2 controls map to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
C2M2 maps to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation with 34% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 C2M2 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cybersecurity Architecture.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 47 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.
C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance(2 mappings)
C2M2: Access Management(9 mappings)
C2M2: Systems Security(2 mappings)
C2M2: Incident Response & Recovery(7 mappings)
+27 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 768 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other C2M2 comparisons
Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 768 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between C2M2 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
C2M2 has 47 controls across its framework, while FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation covers 68 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (34% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cybersecurity Architecture, where 3 C2M2 controls have no direct FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation equivalent.
How many controls map between C2M2 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
Of 47 total C2M2 controls, 16 map directly to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls — representing 34% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping C2M2 to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
31 C2M2 controls have no direct equivalent in FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cybersecurity Architecture with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between C2M2 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
The domain with the highest gap count is Cybersecurity Architecture (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.