Cross-Framework Mapping

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational ResiliencevsUS NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants

See exactly how BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls map to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience maps to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants with 16% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Implementation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Implementation(5 mappings)

FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT3 targets
RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training
RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration
RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management
ISO-8000-IMP-02Quality Improvement
RG5.71-C.7Continuous Monitoring
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
73.54(f)Plan Review and Update

Related Comparisons

Other BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons

Other US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience has 19 controls across its framework, while US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Implementation, where 13 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants equivalent.

How many controls map between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

Of 19 total BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls, 3 map directly to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

16 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct equivalent in US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants. The highest concentration of gaps is in Implementation with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

The domain with the highest gap count is Implementation (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.