TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Belgium CyberFundamentalsvsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

See exactly how Belgium CyberFundamentals controls map to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

40
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
39%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Belgium CyberFundamentals maps to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) with 39% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Belgium CyberFundamentals: Protect.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 40 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Protect(20 mappings)

BE-CF-01Account management and provisioning3 targets
→171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement
→171A-AC-04Assess Separation of Duties
→171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls
BE-CF-02Access enforcement and least privilege5 targets
→171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement
→171A-AC-04Assess Separation of Duties
→171A-AC-05Assess Least Privilege
→171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls
→171A-IA-02Assess Multi-Factor Authentication
BE-CF-03Multi-factor authentication requirements3 targets
→171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls
→171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls
→171A-IA-01Assess Identification and Authentication
BE-CF-06Identity proofing and verification3 targets
→171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement
→171A-AC-04Assess Separation of Duties
→171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls
BE-CF-08Cryptographic protection of data4 targets
→171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls
→171A-MP-01Assess Media Protection
→171A-SC-02Assess Cryptographic Protection
→171A-SC-03Assess Communications Protection
BE-CF-23Baseline configuration establishment
→171A-CM-01Assess Baseline Configuration
BE-CF-24Configuration change control
→171A-CM-02Assess Configuration Change Control

+20 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Belgium CyberFundamentals comparisons

Belgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.044 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar18 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs Azure Security Benchmark18 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)14 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs API 116413 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements13 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs ISO/IEC 27400:202211 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs APPI10 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)22 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)21 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)20 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)20 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)20 mappingsSLSA vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)19 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)19 mappingsPTES vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Belgium CyberFundamentals and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

Belgium CyberFundamentals has 44 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (39% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Belgium CyberFundamentals: Protect, where 10 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) equivalent.

How many controls map between Belgium CyberFundamentals and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

Of 44 total Belgium CyberFundamentals controls, 17 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls — representing 39% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Belgium CyberFundamentals to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

27 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). The highest concentration of gaps is in Belgium CyberFundamentals: Protect with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Belgium CyberFundamentals and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Belgium CyberFundamentals: Protect (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.