Cross-Framework Mapping

Belgium CyberFundamentalsvsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how Belgium CyberFundamentals controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

29
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
53%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Belgium CyberFundamentals maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 53% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Access Control & Identity(9 mappings)

BE-CF-01Account management and provisioning3 targets
AWWA-2.1User Access Management
AWWA-2.3Account Management
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
BE-CF-02Access enforcement and least privilege3 targets
AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
AWWA-2.1User Access Management
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
BE-CF-03Multi-factor authentication requirements
AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms
BE-CF-06Identity proofing and verification2 targets
AWWA-2.1User Access Management
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls

Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection(2 mappings)

BE-CF-08Cryptographic protection of data2 targets
AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Risk Assessment & Management(3 mappings)

BE-CF-13Risk assessment procedures
AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment
BE-CF-15Security categorization
AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment
BE-CF-17Continuous monitoring strategy
AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Incident Response(6 mappings)

BE-CF-20Incident reporting and notification3 targets
AWWA-5.1Incident Response Plan
AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing
ICS-IR-2ICS-specific forensics
BE-CF-21Forensic analysis capabilities3 targets
AWWA-5.1Incident Response Plan
AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing
ICS-IR-2ICS-specific forensics

+9 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Belgium CyberFundamentals comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Belgium CyberFundamentals and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Belgium CyberFundamentals has 32 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (53% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection, where 5 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between Belgium CyberFundamentals and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 32 total Belgium CyberFundamentals controls, 17 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 53% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Belgium CyberFundamentals to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

15 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Belgium CyberFundamentals and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.