TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Belgium CyberFundamentalsvsAPI 1164

See exactly how Belgium CyberFundamentals controls map to API 1164. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

59
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
30%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Belgium CyberFundamentals maps to API 1164 with 30% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Belgium CyberFundamentals: Protect.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 716 frameworks | 430K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 59 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 430K+ mappings across 716 frameworks.

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Protect(20 mappings)

BE-CF-01Account management and provisioning6 targets
→API1164-06Access Control
→API1164-06Access Control
→API1164-07Remote Access
→API1164-07Remote Access
→API1164-09Patch and Vulnerability Management
→API1164-09Patch and Vulnerability Management
BE-CF-02Access enforcement and least privilege6 targets
→API1164-06Access Control
→API1164-06Access Control
→API1164-07Remote Access
→API1164-07Remote Access
→API1164-09Patch and Vulnerability Management
→API1164-09Patch and Vulnerability Management
BE-CF-06Identity proofing and verification6 targets
→API1164-06Access Control
→API1164-06Access Control
→API1164-07Remote Access
→API1164-07Remote Access
→API1164-09Patch and Vulnerability Management
→API1164-09Patch and Vulnerability Management
BE-CF-23Baseline configuration establishment2 targets
→API1164-14Physical Security
→API1164-14Physical Security

+39 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 716 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Belgium CyberFundamentals comparisons

Belgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.044 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar18 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs Azure Security Benchmark18 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)17 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs OWASP Top 10:202515 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)14 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements13 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs ISO/IEC 27400:202211 mappings

Other API 1164 comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs API 116422 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs API 116417 mappingsIEC 62443 vs API 116416 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs API 116416 mappingsNIST SP 1800-32 vs API 116416 mappingsNIS2 Directive vs API 116416 mappingsISO 27019 vs API 116416 mappingsTSA Pipeline Security vs API 116414 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 716 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 716 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (430K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Belgium CyberFundamentals and API 1164?

Belgium CyberFundamentals has 44 controls across its framework, while API 1164 covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Belgium CyberFundamentals: Protect, where 12 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct API 1164 equivalent.

How many controls map between Belgium CyberFundamentals and API 1164?

Of 44 total Belgium CyberFundamentals controls, 13 map directly to API 1164 controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Belgium CyberFundamentals to API 1164?

31 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct equivalent in API 1164. The highest concentration of gaps is in Belgium CyberFundamentals: Protect with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Belgium CyberFundamentals and API 1164?

The domain with the highest gap count is Belgium CyberFundamentals: Protect (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.