TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

BCBS 239vsISO 22320:2018

See exactly how BCBS 239 controls map to ISO 22320:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BCBS 239 maps to ISO 22320:2018 with 32% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 BCBS 239 controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BCBS 239: Information Security Governance(4 mappings)

BCBS239-03Risk appetite and tolerance for IT risk
→ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach
BCBS239-05Roles and responsibilities definition3 targets
→ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
→ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
→ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities

BCBS 239: Operational Resilience(1 mappings)

BCBS239-12Disaster recovery procedures
→ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process

BCBS 239: Third-Party Risk Management(2 mappings)

BCBS239-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
→ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach
BCBS239-19Concentration risk management
→ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach

BCBS 239: Incident Management & Reporting(9 mappings)

BCBS239-22Incident response and containment3 targets
→ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
→ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
→ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples
BCBS239-24Customer notification procedures3 targets
→ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
→ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
→ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples
BCBS239-25Post-incident review and improvement3 targets
→ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
→ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
→ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples

Related Comparisons

Other BCBS 239 comparisons

BCBS 239 vs SWIFT CSP17 mappingsBCBS 239 vs GLBA17 mappingsBCBS 239 vs APRA CPS 23417 mappingsBCBS 239 vs PSD2 SCA17 mappingsBCBS 239 vs FFIEC IT Examination Handbook17 mappingsBCBS 239 vs PCI SSF17 mappingsBCBS 239 vs AICPA SOC 117 mappingsBCBS 239 vs Open Banking Security17 mappings

Other ISO 22320:2018 comparisons

DORA vs ISO 22320:20187 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs ISO 22320:20187 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs ISO 22320:20187 mappingsBermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct vs ISO 22320:20187 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ISO 22320:20187 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs ISO 22320:20187 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO 22320:20187 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs ISO 22320:20187 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between BCBS 239 and ISO 22320:2018?

BCBS 239 has 25 controls across its framework, while ISO 22320:2018 covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls, where 5 BCBS 239 controls have no direct ISO 22320:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between BCBS 239 and ISO 22320:2018?

Of 25 total BCBS 239 controls, 8 map directly to ISO 22320:2018 controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BCBS 239 to ISO 22320:2018?

17 BCBS 239 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22320:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BCBS 239 and ISO 22320:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.