Cross-Framework Mapping

BCBS 239vsISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence

See exactly how BCBS 239 controls map to ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BCBS 239 maps to ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence with 24% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 BCBS 239 controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BCBS 239: Information Security Governance(4 mappings)

BCBS239-03Risk appetite and tolerance for IT risk
ISO-15189-5.6Risk management
BCBS239-05Roles and responsibilities definition3 targets
ISO-15189-5.1Legal entity
ISO-15189-5.4Structure and authority
ISO-15189-6.7Service agreements

BCBS 239: Operational Resilience(2 mappings)

BCBS239-11Business continuity planning and testing
ISO-15189-7.8Continuity and emergency preparedness
BCBS239-12Disaster recovery procedures
ISO-15189-7.8Continuity and emergency preparedness

BCBS 239: Third-Party Risk Management(2 mappings)

BCBS239-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
ISO-15189-5.6Risk management
BCBS239-19Concentration risk management
ISO-15189-5.6Risk management

Related Comparisons

Other BCBS 239 comparisons

Other ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BCBS 239 and ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?

BCBS 239 has 25 controls across its framework, while ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence covers 64 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls, where 5 BCBS 239 controls have no direct ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence equivalent.

How many controls map between BCBS 239 and ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?

Of 25 total BCBS 239 controls, 6 map directly to ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BCBS 239 to ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?

19 BCBS 239 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence. The highest concentration of gaps is in BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BCBS 239 and ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?

The domain with the highest gap count is BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.