Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML)vsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems
See exactly how Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls map to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) maps to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems with 3% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 60 Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls identifies 58 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement and Penalties.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 60 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Customer Identification and Due Diligence(1 mappings)
Enforcement and Penalties(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) comparisons
Other IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?
Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) has 60 controls across its framework, while IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement and Penalties, where 26 Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls have no direct IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems equivalent.
How many controls map between Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?
Of 60 total Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls, 2 map directly to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 58 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?
58 Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls have no direct equivalent in IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement and Penalties with 26 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?
The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement and Penalties (26 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.