Cross-Framework Mapping

Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML)vsNevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls map to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
49
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) maps to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements with 15% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 60 Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls identifies 51 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement and Penalties.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 60 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Customer Identification and Due Diligence(2 mappings)

BSA-CDD-1Beneficial Ownership Identification
FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions
BSA-CDD-3Customer Risk Profiling
FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions

Enforcement and Penalties(7 mappings)

BSA-ENF-1Anti-Structuring Prohibition
FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions
CASL-ENF-02Compliance and Due Diligence
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
RIDTPPA-11Unauthorized Disclosure Penalty
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
UKTSA-ENF-05Security Breach Notification3 targets
FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
ZMDPA-ENF-01Data Protection Commissioner Powers
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection

Reporting Obligations(2 mappings)

BSA-SAR-3SAR Confidentiality
FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions
MSA-13Mandatory Reporting Obligation
FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions

Related Comparisons

Other Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) comparisons

Other Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) and Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) has 60 controls across its framework, while Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement and Penalties, where 22 Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls have no direct Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) and Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 60 total Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls, 9 map directly to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 51 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

51 Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls have no direct equivalent in Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement and Penalties with 22 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) and Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement and Penalties (22 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.