Cross-Framework Mapping

Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML)vsCISA Secure by Design Principles

See exactly how Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls map to CISA Secure by Design Principles. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
57
Gaps Found
2%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) maps to CISA Secure by Design Principles with 2% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 60 Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls identifies 59 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement and Penalties.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 60 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Customer Identification and Due Diligence(3 mappings)

BSA-CIP-2Identity Verification3 targets
SBD-1.1Secure by Default Configuration
SBD-1.2Eliminate Default Passwords
SBD-1.3Free Security Features for All Tiers

Related Comparisons

Other Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) comparisons

Other CISA Secure by Design Principles comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) and CISA Secure by Design Principles?

Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) has 60 controls across its framework, while CISA Secure by Design Principles covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement and Penalties, where 27 Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls have no direct CISA Secure by Design Principles equivalent.

How many controls map between Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) and CISA Secure by Design Principles?

Of 60 total Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls, 1 map directly to CISA Secure by Design Principles controls — representing 2% coverage. The remaining 59 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) to CISA Secure by Design Principles?

59 Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Secure by Design Principles. The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement and Penalties with 27 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) and CISA Secure by Design Principles?

The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement and Penalties (27 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.