O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)vsCISA Secure by Design Principles
See exactly how O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) controls map to CISA Secure by Design Principles. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) maps to CISA Secure by Design Principles with 46% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 13 O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Protocols (O-RAN.WG11 Pillar 3).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 13 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Security Threat Modeling (O-RAN.WG11 Pillar 1)(4 mappings)
Security Requirements (O-RAN.WG11 Pillar 2 - O-R003)(4 mappings)
Security Protocols (O-RAN.WG11 Pillar 3)(2 mappings)
Security Testing (O-RAN.WG11 Pillar 4)(1 mappings)
Data and Application Security(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) comparisons
Other CISA Secure by Design Principles comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) and CISA Secure by Design Principles?
O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) has 13 controls across its framework, while CISA Secure by Design Principles covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (46% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Protocols (O-RAN.WG11 Pillar 3), where 2 O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) controls have no direct CISA Secure by Design Principles equivalent.
How many controls map between O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) and CISA Secure by Design Principles?
Of 13 total O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) controls, 6 map directly to CISA Secure by Design Principles controls — representing 46% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) to CISA Secure by Design Principles?
7 O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Secure by Design Principles. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Protocols (O-RAN.WG11 Pillar 3) with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) and CISA Secure by Design Principles?
The domain with the highest gap count is Security Protocols (O-RAN.WG11 Pillar 3) (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.