TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Azure Security BenchmarkvsSIG (Shared Assessments)

See exactly how Azure Security Benchmark controls map to SIG (Shared Assessments). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
44
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Azure Security Benchmark maps to SIG (Shared Assessments) with 19% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 54 Azure Security Benchmark controls identifies 44 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Identity Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 54 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Governance(1 mappings)

ASB-01Shared responsibility model definition
→SHAREASSESS-1Information Governance and Risk

Azure Security Benchmark: Identity & Access in Cloud(3 mappings)

ASB-06Cloud identity management
→SHAREASSESS-2Access Control, Identity, Authentication
ASB-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
→SHAREASSESS-2Access Control, Identity, Authentication
ASB-08Privileged access in cloud environments
→SHAREASSESS-2Access Control, Identity, Authentication

Azure Security Benchmark: Data Protection in Cloud(3 mappings)

ASB-11Data classification for cloud
→SHAREASSESS-2Access Control, Identity, Authentication
ASB-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
→SHAREASSESS-3Network Security, Endpoint, Data Protection
ASB-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
→SHAREASSESS-4Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security

Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Infrastructure Security(1 mappings)

ASB-16Virtual network segmentation
→SHAREASSESS-4Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security

Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(2 mappings)

ASB-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
→SHAREASSESS-4Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security
ASB-23Cloud vulnerability management
→SHAREASSESS-4Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security

Related Comparisons

Other Azure Security Benchmark comparisons

Azure Security Benchmark vs NIST SP 800-14620 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST SP 800-14520 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST SP 800-14420 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs MTCS (Singapore)20 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ISMAP (Japan)20 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ISO 2701720 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST SP 800-19020 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ISO 2701820 mappings

Other SIG (Shared Assessments) comparisons

ISO 27043 vs SIG (Shared Assessments)4 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs SIG (Shared Assessments)4 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs SIG (Shared Assessments)4 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs SIG (Shared Assessments)4 mappingsNIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices vs SIG (Shared Assessments)4 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs SIG (Shared Assessments)4 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs SIG (Shared Assessments)4 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs SIG (Shared Assessments)4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Azure Security Benchmark and SIG (Shared Assessments)?

Azure Security Benchmark has 54 controls across its framework, while SIG (Shared Assessments) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Identity Management, where 5 Azure Security Benchmark controls have no direct SIG (Shared Assessments) equivalent.

How many controls map between Azure Security Benchmark and SIG (Shared Assessments)?

Of 54 total Azure Security Benchmark controls, 10 map directly to SIG (Shared Assessments) controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 44 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Azure Security Benchmark to SIG (Shared Assessments)?

44 Azure Security Benchmark controls have no direct equivalent in SIG (Shared Assessments). The highest concentration of gaps is in Identity Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Azure Security Benchmark and SIG (Shared Assessments)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Identity Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.