TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsSIG (Shared Assessments)

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to SIG (Shared Assessments). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
79
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to SIG (Shared Assessments) with 11% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 89 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 79 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Identity & Access Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 89 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cloud Security Overview(1 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition
→SHAREASSESS-1Information Governance and Risk

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-06Cloud identity management
→SHAREASSESS-2Access Control, Identity, Authentication
AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
→SHAREASSESS-2Access Control, Identity, Authentication
AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments
→SHAREASSESS-2Access Control, Identity, Authentication

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-11Data classification for cloud
→SHAREASSESS-2Access Control, Identity, Authentication
AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
→SHAREASSESS-3Network Security, Endpoint, Data Protection
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
→SHAREASSESS-4Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security(1 mappings)

AWS-WA-16Virtual network segmentation
→SHAREASSESS-4Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
→SHAREASSESS-4Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security
AWS-WA-23Cloud vulnerability management
→SHAREASSESS-4Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14619 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14419 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISMAP (Japan)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappings

Other SIG (Shared Assessments) comparisons

ISO 27043 vs SIG (Shared Assessments)4 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs SIG (Shared Assessments)4 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs SIG (Shared Assessments)4 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs SIG (Shared Assessments)4 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs SIG (Shared Assessments)4 mappingsNIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices vs SIG (Shared Assessments)4 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs SIG (Shared Assessments)4 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs SIG (Shared Assessments)4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and SIG (Shared Assessments)?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 89 controls across its framework, while SIG (Shared Assessments) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Identity & Access Management, where 15 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct SIG (Shared Assessments) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and SIG (Shared Assessments)?

Of 89 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 10 map directly to SIG (Shared Assessments) controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 79 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to SIG (Shared Assessments)?

79 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in SIG (Shared Assessments). The highest concentration of gaps is in Identity & Access Management with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and SIG (Shared Assessments)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Identity & Access Management (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.